patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Rochester Cider Mill Case Continues: Barkhams, Oakland Township Ordered Into Facilitation

Judge Michael Warren ordered the two parties, who have been locked in a legal battle since 2010, to meet with a court facilitator to amend the judgment.

 

The Charter Township of Oakland and the Rochester Cider Mill have been ordered to meet with a court-appointed mediator – in this case, a retired judge – to work together to reach an agreement regarding a 1987 court order that restricts the operation of the cider mill while still allowing it to operate as a business in an area zoned for single-family residences.

Tom Barkham, who owns the Rochester Cider Mill, filed a motion to repeal the 1987 order in March, saying that the cider mill should be allowed to operate as a farm market under the current Michigan Right to Farm Act.

The order was not repealed today, as the owners of the cider mill had hoped it would be, at least in part because the order has already been in place for 24 years. Judge Michael Warren heard arguments from attorneys representing both parties during Wednesday’s hearing in Oakland County Circuit Court.

“What we’re seeking here is fairness and consistency,” said Geoffrey Harrison, attorney for Rochester Cider Mill. “There’s case law that suggests that something like a year is considered reasonable. Well, maybe that’s true in a usual case … but this is not a usual case in many respects.

“I find it a little bit difficult to reconcile the fact that on one hand, the township is claiming it’s too late to seek to avoid the operation of this order, but they haven’t enforced it, either, from 1987 to 2010.”

“Everybody’s been working with that judgment for 24 years, and it’s been working fine,” said Steven Joppich, attorney for Oakland Township. “It’s never been enforced to the point of bringing it to court. … We had no need to come to court to enforce it till 2010, when things escalated and the business was expanded beyond the terms of that judgment.”

Judge Warren agreed with the township, saying, "If you sit on your rights for 20 years, that's pretty close to adverse possession.”

He added, “Now, it’s 2011. That’s over 20 years. How is that a reasonable time? … If this were 1991 and you came to court … that I could understand.”

The judge ordered the case into facilitation, requiring the Rochester Cider Mill and Charter Township of Oakland to meet with a mediator to work through their differences and reach an agreement. The parties will appear again before Judge Warren within 60 days, said Joppich.

“We would agree upon a proposed amendment to the order (and) bring it to Judge Warren,” Joppich said. “If he finds it acceptable, he would enter it and it would become the new order of the court that would apply to the property.”

"We'd hoped to get an answer today," Barkham said an interview with Patch. "It sounds like a delay."

Barkham said he hoped the court would rule in his favor soon.

"I think it's a proper result. We've been asking the cider mill to talk since before we came in for the contempt hearing," Joppich said. “We’re glad to see they’re going to be forced to sit down with us.”

phyllis andrus

9:11 am on Thursday, May 12, 2011

HERE'S MY TAKE ON THIS ISSUE... "BACK OFF" THE BARKHAM'S TOWNSHIP!!! THIS FAMILY HAS BEEN CONTRIBUTING TO THIS LOCALE FOR GENERATIONS! COULD THE REAL ISSUE ACTUALLY BE COMPETITION TO THE FOGLER'S FARM MARKET???

Reply
Comment_arrow

Char Kruse

2:25 pm on Thursday, May 12, 2011

I agree Phyllis! I think that is part of the reasoning,plus the township owns the paint creek cider mill

lmc

10:32 am on Thursday, May 12, 2011

As a township resident I find this to be a WASTE of township funds.
Allow the Barkhams to operate their business fully, stop harassing them.
I do not see where the market/gas station @ the corner of
Rochester & 32 Mile is being harassed & it is in worse shape than the Cider Mill.

Reply

JustACitizen1

4:02 pm on Thursday, May 12, 2011

First off the mill is over 50 years old, but the land is still zoned residental? I just don't get it.

Reply

megan perrera

10:11 pm on Thursday, May 12, 2011

Leave the Barkhams alone they have been contributing members to this community forever !!!!!

Reply

megan perrera

10:13 pm on Thursday, May 12, 2011

take up another issue, stop such petty issues its a waste of OUR money

Reply

Ann Marie Rogers

11:23 am on Friday, May 13, 2011

The township board is a bunch of petty, control freaks that want to micro-manage all of us. This is clear if you read their new proposed ordinances. They want to regulate all of our freedoms away and do away with our private property rights. They should ALL be voted out ASAP. They abuse their power on a continual basis and love to harass wonderful people like the Barkhams who only want to sell produce and other farm related products. They have to keep up with the times and make a living.
Based on the Board's harassment of the Barkhams, under the guise of "protecting" residents, one would think the Barkhams want to put up giant neon signs and have carnivals and loud music at the mill. Give me a break! Those Oakland Township officials make me sick!
I don't want my tax dollars being spent on harassing and defaming upstanding people like the Barkhams. If they are going after the Barkhams now, who will be their next victim?

Reply

Leave a comment