Should Snyder Sign Bill Allowing Concealed Weapons in Schools?
On Friday, a gunman killed at least 27 at a school in Newtown, CT. Meanwhile in Michigan, Gov. Snyder has a bill on his desk that would allow some concealed guns in schools. What do you think?
Should Michigan's governor sign a bill on is desk that would allow concealed weapons in former no-gun zones, like schools?
The question is timely:
- Under legislation that passed the House and Senate in Michigan this week, gun owners with concealed weapon permits could carry a gun into schools, daycares, hospitals or public arenas if they get extra training. The bill is awaiting Gov. Rick Snyder's signature, according to MLive.
- And on Friday, a gunman opened fire in a school in Newtown, CT, killing at least 27 died in a shooting an an elementary school, including 18 children.
What do you think of the legislation? Should the governor sign it?
Erin
3:11 pm on Friday, December 14, 2012
Stunned and so sad, as everyone is, at the horror that occured in CT. Speechless.
I was unaware a new gun law was even on the agenda, and saw it passed in the wee hours of this morning in MI legislature. I'm still trying to read all the details and implications.
These are very complicated subjects, and we need to be careful not to conflate issues or situations. Perhaps Snyder should set this one aside till after the holiday break. We don't want emotion and haste to effect potentially far-reaching legislation.
Howard Berkowitz
5:42 pm on Friday, December 14, 2012
These are not complicated subjects, I made a living for 5 years at gunshows. There is no need for high capacity clips and assault weapons. Some congressman with some balls needs to introduce the Clinton assault weapon ban which expired under Bush NEXT WEEK. Then go from there with more regulation.
Snyder is a coward, so I am sure after today he wont sign that bill even though he probably promised Dick Devoss he would sign it.
An elementary school, I am sure the NRA will propose training 4 year olds to use automatic weapons so they can defend themselves next time a nut case with highcapacity clips and an automatic weapon walk into their KINDERGARTEN.
billybob
6:53 pm on Friday, December 14, 2012
Howard you are a liar. You did not in fact make a living selling at gunshows. Clips load magazines Howard, you should know that. And nobody asks for "Assault Weapons" at gunshows either because that name was given by the left in order to deamonize military style semi-automatic fire arms. And in this case nobody used "clips", and automatic weapons. Crawl back under your rock with your lieing leftest agenda. This was a bad sad thing. Every teacher should have the right to carry concealed. And it should be mandatory that they atleast get training in case they feel the need to carry. Remember, these are areas that are supposed to be gun free. None of these nutjobs pay any atention to that law.
Howard Berkowitz
7:02 pm on Friday, December 14, 2012
The detachable magazine is often controversially referred to as a clip.[1][2]
Howard Berkowitz
7:08 pm on Friday, December 14, 2012
They dont have to ask for anything, they are laid out right there on the tables. They of course usually ask for them by name AK47 (Kalishnokov) and AR15 are the most sought after. They are assault weapons.
Erin
3:25 pm on Friday, December 14, 2012
Most important today - sending prayers to the families, school, community, and the first responders who are dealing with an unthinkable scene.
Joshua Raymond
3:58 pm on Friday, December 14, 2012
I agree with Erin. This is not an issue we need to debate today. Right now every parent is wondering if this could happen to their children and holding them a little bit closer. We don't need to get into divisive politics with strong opinions at this time.
Marianne Maurer
4:39 pm on Friday, December 14, 2012
Joshua,
I agree this is not the time for an impassioned discussion on gun control. The issue as the article states on concealed weapons in schools and other public places is now a bill passed this week in a ver busy Lansing, and is on the Gov. desk to be signed.
Many of us were not aware it went through both houses so quickly. The saddenss of today should make us all ask the Gov. to slow down and let's take a second look. We have a lot at stake and politics should not rule this decision. Email the Gov. Today and request more time on this decision. Extra training with guns is not the answer to safety in our schools, daycares, and other public places. I am not against guns, I'm against the weak laws we have in governing their sale.
Scot Beaton
4:54 pm on Friday, December 14, 2012
Joshua, Erin, Marianne... thanks for you thoughts -- I agree this is not an issue we need to debate today.
Howard Berkowitz
5:44 pm on Friday, December 14, 2012
That is wrong we need to debate this issue right this minute. 5 YEAR OLDS do you understand? 5 YEAR OLDS.
Marianne Maurer
4:01 pm on Friday, December 14, 2012
Extra training!!! The shooters in the past public shootings seem to do quite well with weapons. This is not the answer, but then Lansing knows what's best. It's amazing how much they have gotten done since the election.
Maybe we could drop party lines and really take a look at gun control laws. Guns in schools and public places in the wrong hands will only make things worse. I'm sure the bill will be signed I expect nothing less.
Dorothy
4:55 pm on Friday, December 14, 2012
Drop party lines? You're talking to ideologues. The corporatists and the religious zealots have joined forces, and they do what DeVos and the Koch brothers tell them to do. Follow the money.
Howard Berkowitz
8:43 am on Saturday, December 15, 2012
No Snyder is a coward , he would of signed the bill outta the sight of the public. He wont sign it now, not after this tragedy.
Dorothy
4:49 pm on Friday, December 14, 2012
Why not? He's signed every other piece of legislation the crazy GOP has put in front of him. The fact that the legislation is even sitting on his desk is testament to the lunatics that are the GOP. If it wasn't for the shooting, there is no doubt in my mind that Snyder would sign this legislation into law. I have never seen a more arrogant or ignorant administration than this one. He keeps throwing the baby out with bath water and reinventing the wheel at taxpayer expense. Snyder, the Tea Party, and the GOP are owned by the Koch brothers, and they have zero respect for people, government, public service, rule of law, or the democratic process. The laws they've passed prove it. We the people vote to repeal the emergency manager law, and the ideologues pass and Snyder signs a new one. 2014 can't come soon enough.
chuck brandon
10:48 am on Saturday, December 15, 2012
You mean like the arrogant administration that lied to us about the cost of Obamacare, saying the cost was going to be $900 billion and is now $1.7 trillion, according to the CBO? The same admin. that actually locked out Republicans during negotiations?. The same admin. that passed the bill without any Republican "yes" votes? The same admin. that passed a bill that 60% of the country did not want? Or, are you talking about the admin. that changed the wording in the welfare law regarding the work requirement knowing full well that what he did was illegal, according to the GAO? Or are you talking about the admin. that fired a CEO of a company (GM) that is illegal? Or are you talking about the admin. that is bought and paid for by Geo. Soros, a socialist and is supported by every communist and socialist party here in the U.S. and around the world?
Scot Beaton
5:01 pm on Friday, December 14, 2012
Local Ordinances...
Notice: Generally, to be bound by an ordinance, a person must have notice of an ordinance, or the reasonable opportunity to have had notice of it. This requirement does not typically pose any problems. State statutes may require that specific notice requirements be met in adopting or amending an ordinance. For example, MCL 125.584 of the City and Village Zoning Act provides that prior to the adoption of a zoning ordinance, not less than 15 days’ notice of the time and the place of the public hearing must be published in a newspaper of general circulation. Local charters may also contain notice requirements which must be observed." -- Published by the Michigan Municipal League, July 2004
My heart and prayers go out to those families, parents & children. Question for another day... why is our State Legislature not held accountable to the same standards as local government... they require us to hold public hearings, should we not require them?
chuck brandon
5:31 pm on Friday, December 14, 2012
Just so everyone knows, Mi. is an open carry state and has been since 1837 when it first became a state. As an open carry state, a person may carry openly in a school, church, etc.
http://www.cmda-law.com/Newsroom/Firearms+Open+Carry+is+Legal+in+Michigan-179.html
FCF
7:54 am on Saturday, December 15, 2012
Thank you, excellent article to reference. Hope everyone in the discussion reads it!
chuck brandon
5:34 pm on Friday, December 14, 2012
Sorry, I forgot to add that today isn't appropriate for a debate. Those kids could have been one of my grandkids. Just makes me sick
Howard Berkowitz
5:46 pm on Friday, December 14, 2012
THAT IS the reason this issue must have action taken, immediately.
billybob
7:01 pm on Friday, December 14, 2012
Never let a good crisis go to waist eh Howard. You are sick, these are terrible things. We should all be mourning the loss of life these events have taken. Not pushing an emotion based agenda for your own satisfaction.
Carol Day
8:32 am on Saturday, December 15, 2012
I agree with you, Howard. Let the emotion die down and so will this issue just like after the last unthinkable, terrible massive shooting.
Kevin
6:38 pm on Friday, December 14, 2012
Would somebody please explain to me what is the correlation between the proposed MI gun legislation and today's tragedy? Did all the shoooters in the decades of previous mass shootings all have "their proper paperwork filled out before they committed their crimes.
Carol Day
8:35 am on Saturday, December 15, 2012
“Since 1982, there have been at least 61 mass murders carried out with firearms across the country, with the killings unfolding in 30 states from Massachusetts to Hawaii,” they found. And in most cases, the killers had obtained their weapons legally." Excerpt from: http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/wp/2012/12/14/nine-facts-about-guns-and-mass-shootings-in-the-united-states/?h
Lee Zendel
7:51 pm on Friday, December 14, 2012
Did anyone notice that in China today a family member went to his children's school and slashed 20 some students and one adult with a knife? Maybe, we need a knife control law so the same thing does not occur in the U.S.
Howard Berkowitz
10:58 pm on Friday, December 14, 2012
You bring up something very interesting an attack on 20 students with a knife since guns are not in the hands of civilians in China, NOBODY DIED NOBODY DIED
Thanks for making that point
Lana
11:28 pm on Friday, December 14, 2012
Why are the gun advocates always so loud and the rest of us silent?
Howard Berkowitz
11:32 pm on Friday, December 14, 2012
Most NRA members are for backround checks and are open to regulation of high capacity clips. It is the leadership of the NRA that are fanatics and outta control.
chuck brandon
11:53 pm on Friday, December 14, 2012
Lana, "Why are the gun advocates always so loud and the rest of us silent?" Mayor Bloomberg has already started to become loud---it's just beginning. My belief is it's not the guns, but the people with them that is the problem. There is a saying "65 million legal gun owners didn't kill anyone today." There's more legal owners than illegal owners---but some of those illegal owners are evil. (It appears that the 20 year old that did the killing was autistic and took the guns from his mother.) I also think tragedies that are happening today that didn't happen 30, 40, 50 years ago is because god was taken out of schools, we were made to believe that everything is society's fault, we're not not responsible for our own actions, and the violence on TV and movies. Believe me, I'm no bible thumping preacher---far from it. But, when a society gets hammered everyday that it is ok to be immoral, unethical,uncaring, and selfish, bad things will happen---and more often. I don't expect things will get any better in the near future, either.
Thomas Gagne
11:40 pm on Friday, December 14, 2012
If someone were to come into my son's school and begin shooting, I want his teachers to have more to guard his life with than a phone.
Howard Berkowitz
12:06 am on Saturday, December 15, 2012
The shooters mother was a teacher at the school, she had a gun, in fact she had 2 guns, the ones that killed the her and 26 more.
ken laskie
7:02 am on Saturday, December 15, 2012
I want each room to have a lockbox where the teacher can put there weapon... the first foot in the door from this monster has a 40sw to the forehead
Howard Berkowitz
8:26 am on Saturday, December 15, 2012
yea more guns, genius
Chris Ann Roncone-Voudoukis
11:49 am on Saturday, December 15, 2012
You know since so many people have pointed out that if the teachers had guns this wouldn't have happened I have a proposal. Schools could get a special accreditation. They could get a little cowboy hat on the door with the slogan "this school carries" All the teachers would have to take special fire arm classes, like how to stop a semi-automatic attack. Then after they get gun permits they could mount a semi-automatic on each end of the classroom (out of reach of the kids of course) since they would have to get in the 1st shot, kind of pointless otherwise.
Colleen Barkham
7:35 pm on Saturday, December 15, 2012
That is so stupid! Most teachers want nothing to do with guns! Next you'll be suggesting that an education degree include a gun class and the continueing certificate require monthly practice! Yahoo!
Dorothy
7:22 am on Saturday, December 15, 2012
You won't pay them, but you'll be happy to arm them.
Richard Happening
3:20 pm on Saturday, December 15, 2012
Dorothy,
Teachers aren't paid? That is terrible. Why would they even show up for work?
FCF
8:19 am on Saturday, December 15, 2012
As far as gun advocates getting loud, check the liberal pols response today - immediately calling for more gun control - Obama, Cuomo, Bloomberg, Menino - all have bodyguards let me add. My guess is they probably have a gun at home for the protection of themselves and their families! If so, what would that say about their shouts!
The Michigan legislation should be signed immediately as a statement that if just one of those six adults had a gun - lives might have been saved. Or, at least they all would have had a better chance than thinking they were safe by hiding in a closet or bathroom.
My suggestion for all those who want all guns off the street is to also shout it! Let the neighborhood know where you stand by placing this sign in your home window , "THIS IS A GUN FREE HOME."
Drugs are illegal and we have drugs on the street. If we make guns illegal, there will be guns on the street but only the bad guys will have them.
Personally, I feel safer knowing there are about 400,000 residents of Michigan with a Carry Permit!
Nothing can bring back those who died and the twenty innocents among them. Our hearts are heavy for the horror those parents must be going through with Christmas so near and the loss so great!
We already see what can happen when all the good people are disarmed in situations like this, maybe it is time to permit those who are guardians of our children to be even better guardians!
Carol Day
8:24 am on Saturday, December 15, 2012
Talks about gun control are long overdue:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/wp/2012/12/14/nine-facts-about-guns-and-mass-shootings-in-the-united-states/?h
Michele Manhire
8:49 am on Saturday, December 15, 2012
Enough, enough, enough about gun control. The pervasive sentiment that regulation will stop these types of evil crimes from happening is wrong. The only thing that will stop these crimes is a comprehensive change in society's view of how we raise our children. Sure I hugged my kids a little tighter yesterday, but I'm not scared someone is going to enter their school and do the same thing. I'm more scared the little shit down the street is only one of a million children being raised with no sense of right and wrong, complete lack of personal responsibility, and who has seen horrible movies numerous times of the ilk that weren't even being made when I was that age, or are allowed to freely play video games so violent it turns my stomach to just hear them. What the hell do you expect people??? Evil in -- evil out. Gun control my butt... try raising kids who have SELF CONTROL and know how to cope with the fact that life is H A R D. Why the hell can't people cope anymore?? "You're the best!" "Trophies for all!" A sad state of affairs for us all.
FCF
8:55 am on Saturday, December 15, 2012
Ditto Michele!!!
Howard Berkowitz
9:19 am on Saturday, December 15, 2012
actually we know Clintons assault weapons ban was effective in preventing the large carnage of these kinda attacks. That is the first law that needs to be put back in effect. There doesnt have to be any debate or planning, just pass it again.
Col. Duke Lacrosse
11:49 am on Saturday, December 15, 2012
The Clinton AWB was incredibly ineffective. It outlawed certain combinations of "scary features" of semi-automatic rifles. I bought my first AR15 in the middle of the AWB. And it never has, and never will, be used to kill an innocent person.
Howard Berkowitz is very misinformed.
Howard Berkowitz
12:51 pm on Saturday, December 15, 2012
The part of the ban I really am concerned with is the high capacity mags, not so much the weapons themselves,,but I have no problem with the entire package.
Marcus Burger
2:14 pm on Saturday, December 15, 2012
RIGHT ON Michele! your comments hit the nail on the head. Did you read about the KC football team and their idea to wear a patch honoring the idiot that shot his wife and then himself? They see the shooting as the GUNS fault, not the bonehead with his finger on the trigger, having an illegitimate kid, two girlfriends (maybe more), heavy drinking and partying, etc. Maybe we should outlaw booze again? sheesh.....
from Wiki:
A 2004 critical review of research on firearms by a National Research Council panel also noted that academic studies of the assault weapon ban "did not reveal any clear impacts on gun violence" and noted "due to the fact that the relative rarity with which the banned guns were used in crime before the ban ... the maximum potential effect of the ban on gun violence outcomes would be very small...."
The United States Department of Justice National Institute of Justice found should the ban be renewed, its effects on gun violence would likely be small, and perhaps too small for reliable measurement, because rifles in general, including rifles referred to as "assault rifles" or "assault weapons", are rarely used in gun crimes
Patricia Jones
9:27 am on Saturday, December 15, 2012
On this new Michigan bill, I find it unbelievable that they would include schools, church's and arena's to have guns allowed. When the NBA won't allow any caps on bottles such as water, pop etc because it might be thrown. But guns would be ok. I hope Governor Snyder does not sign this bill as it stands.
Col. Duke Lacrosse
12:05 pm on Saturday, December 15, 2012
Patricia, they are not explicitly attempting to put guns in those places. The bill is to streamline things for legal concealed carriers. As it is now, I can carry concealed at all kinds of places, around any type of person. But if I want to go into a school, daycare center, movie theater, sports arena, bar, tavern, restaurant, hospital, or church I have to either 1) disarm, or 2) CARRY MY GUN OPENLY. If I disarm, that means I have to leave my pistol somewhere (a car most likely) where it can be stolen. If I carry openly, people with delicate sensibilities get scared. Why can't I just carry the darned thing like I do everywhere else?
Additionally, any privately owned facility of the type just listed is allowed to prohibit concealed carry on their property.
Please don't let the anti-gun media shape your opinion.
Steve Clarke
12:16 pm on Saturday, December 15, 2012
Bottle caps can ( and were ) thrown onto the court. A player can slip and be injured. That IS WHY they are banned. I won't comment anymore about this as it would senseless to discuss this with anyone that this to a shooting.
Howard Berkowitz
1:01 pm on Saturday, December 15, 2012
I am not anti gun, I made my living for 5 years working gunshows, selling nightvision, laser sights, holsters,shooting bags and holsters.
Most people in the mainstream want sensible gun control, we are not anti gun we are anti stupid.
80% of people that acquire a permit to carry, carry for 2 weeks then lock it back up at home and never carry it, too much trouble.
I can carry, but what for I am 59 years old and never had any trouble and I have been going into Detroit almost daily my entire life.
In the last 20 years gun laws have put more guns in the hands of legal owners and you see what we are getting. High capacity clips are not needed for personal protection, they need to be banned.
Dave D
9:34 am on Saturday, December 15, 2012
Regardless of your viewpoints on gun control, the reality is that there have already been enough firearms produced, and circulating, to arm every man, woman, and child in this country. Gun control is now impossible. Mentally disturbed people who intend on killing with a gun do not care about the law (the shooter used his Mothers guns) or whether they are killed as a result of their actions. Criminals who intend on killing with a firearm do not care about laws either and generally do not care whether they are killed as a result. So much of American society has become so entertained by violence on so many fronts that outrageous acts are now easily considered as a potential reality by the fringe of society. What used to be shocking is now commonplace in video games and the most popular movies. Trying to ban violence in games and movies will not help - unless our society as a whole is willing to make the changes. The mere fact that we are even seriously discussing arming teachers to combat a shooter confirms my point that our society has internalized violence not only as a viable action to take when things get tough, but also as a viable solution to our troubles. As this point, nothing short of divine intervention will stop this crazy train. I doubt whether our society has the will to make sweeping cultural changes required to alter the public perception of violence. This is the new normal.
doug
9:35 am on Saturday, December 15, 2012
The largest mass killing of this type took place in Norway, where a deranged person killed 77 kids with a gun. Norway has a total ban on guns. I wish it was as easy as passing a law, but it isn't. Gun laws keep guns from law biding people, not criminals or crazy people. We have open borders and half a billion guns already here.
That said, as a legal gun owner I have no problem with backround checks and registration. Lets not kid ourselves to think passing a law can stop someone bent on doing something like this.
Howard Berkowitz
11:19 am on Saturday, December 15, 2012
The incidents like this a far far less in those countrys. Yesterday in China there was an attack on 20 kids with a knife cause there are no guns. NOBODY DIED
Right2Work
10:09 am on Saturday, December 15, 2012
This clearly demonstrates the real tragedy : the pitiful state of mental healthcare in the US. Very disturbed patients can inflict a lot of damage with or without guns.
Joshua Raymond
10:35 am on Saturday, December 15, 2012
Given the limited and inaccurate information already released, I would urge caution in describing the murderer as autistic, nerdy, having a personality disorder, or other terms. Most descriptions on the news have not been from professionals. We do not want to stigmatize or stereotype members of these communities for the actions of one person. It isn't right when it is done with other minorities and made worse with groups of people that are poorly understood by the general populace.
Lianne Mathie
11:04 am on Saturday, December 15, 2012
Joshua, the information is not clear just yet, but the last few mass shooting have a common theme of mental illness. I think that is being ignored. Jared Loughner, Anders Breivik, James Holmes all had serious mental issues that were not addressed. I really think that needs to be part of the conversation. This is not a black and white issue.
Joshua Raymond
11:13 am on Saturday, December 15, 2012
Lianne, I'm not saying that mental illness shouldn't be addressed. However, unfounded speculation that this killer acted as he did because of Aspergers, being a goth or nerd, or some unnamed "personality disorder" is not the same as addressing mental illness, but only serves to incite fear against a group of individuals.
Erin
3:59 pm on Saturday, December 15, 2012
Joshua and Lianne - you both make excellent points. No question these events will, and should, lead to a broader discussion of mental health issues/care (or lack thereof) in the context of violent crime.
Erin
7:32 pm on Saturday, December 15, 2012
Joshua - more to your point, I meant to mention that yes, we must be careful not to draw too broad a stroke when labeling or categorizing disorders, or what people are capable of with such diagnoses. Right now, we don't know much at all about the perpetrator in CT.
Dave D
12:00 pm on Saturday, December 15, 2012
Pretty clear to me that anyone who is capable of going into an ElementarySchool and killing little kids has mental health issues. I don't need them to have been diagnosed before I can safely claim they are mentally challenged.
Lianne Mathie
12:15 pm on Saturday, December 15, 2012
I guess my issue is, how do we keep weapons away and out of the hand of the mentally ill? The NRA has got to be part of this conversation. Guns are not going away in America, that much is clear to me.
Steve Clarke
12:04 pm on Saturday, December 15, 2012
Mr.Berkowitz we do not know what type of weapons or the type of magazine(s) he used. There were 3 guns; 2 pistols and a rifle - NOT AUTOMATIC as you stated but,semi auto . Yes,his mother had guns and THEY WERE THE ONES THAT HE KILLED HER WITH AND THEN went to the school. These are the facts as I know them.
Sir,you are very reckless with the info you are disseminating . I doubt you were involved with gun events, if you were,I would bet you were not very successful.
I also think you would fit in just fine living in CHINA. Ever been there ? I have.
Howard Berkowitz
1:19 pm on Saturday, December 15, 2012
I have not made one personal attack but almost everyone of you gun advocates have.
So it is pretty clear but they have not reported it exactly, that he left the rifle in the car and used the handguns. Never once did I say or imply automatic weapons.
But we know he squeezed off about 100 rounds in a very short period of time, that tells me he most likely had highcapacity mags.
You can go to Ohio and INdiana guns shows and buy handguns in the isles with no paperwork what so ever, it has been reported that about 40% of all handguns are bought in this or a similar matter. No need for that, no need for highcapacity mags.
I have personaly bought hand guns in this matter, once from an Indian police officer, perfectly legal at the time and I think it still is.
I am not anti gun at all I think most gun nuts are buying too many thinking they are going to fight the government lol. The government is about 20 years ahead of what private people have and private people would be no match what so ever against the government.
There are many things we can do to control guns in a way that reduces these crazy mass killings and still protect the right of people to buy as many guns as they like and bury them in their backyards lol. That is where I stand on gun control, I am not anti gun.
Col. Duke Lacrosse
3:26 pm on Saturday, December 15, 2012
Berkowitz, when it comes time to defend myself, my friends, or my family from a determined attacker, I want the biggest, most powerful, highest capacity firearm I can get my hands on. And so should you, if you have half a brain.
Thomas Gagne
4:35 pm on Saturday, December 15, 2012
I haven't read that he used high-capacity mags or a count of casings. Does anyone have a reference?
Erin
7:37 pm on Saturday, December 15, 2012
Howard and Steve - here is the data on the "40% of gun sales do not involve a background check" (due to gun show loop hole and internet and other personal sales)
This is a good explantion of where the data comes from-
"Mayor Michael Bloomberg says 40 percent of guns are sold without a background check"
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2012/jul/25/michael-bloomberg/mayor-michael-bloomberg-says-40-percent-guns-are-s/
Steve Clarke
12:58 pm on Saturday, December 15, 2012
Mr. Berkowitz you don't have your facts confused,you are a LIAR. Where do yo come up with the statement you made in on of your rants above that most NRA members are FOR background checks and other types of regulations ?
If you have a factual comment,make it,other wise go back to bed.
Erin
1:39 pm on Saturday, December 15, 2012
Steve - easy on the name-calling."Liar" is pretty strong - especially when there is empirical data supporting some of Mr. Berkowitz's assertions.
"Gun Owners Surveyed By Frank Luntz Express Broad Support For Gun Control Policies"
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/07/24/gun-owners-frank-luntz_n_1699140.html?1343154409
NOTE: Frank Lutz is THE GOP pollster, wordsmith and a main go-to guy for Marketing/Branding for (R) candidates.
- some of the above article written in wake of Aurora, here:
"The study, which was conducted in May by GOP wordsmith Frank Luntz, revealed the following data points as well:
•74 percent of NRA members believe concealed carry permits should only be granted to applicants who have completed gun safety training.
•68 percent of NRA members believe concealed carry permits should only be granted to applicants who do not have prior arrests for domestic violence.
•63 percent of NRA members believe concealed carry permits should only be granted to applicants 21 years of age or older.
•75 percent of NRA members believe that concealed carry permits should be granted only to those applicants who have not committed any violent misdemeanors.
Taken in full, the numbers cut against the conventional wisdom, which holds that there is little political will for tackling gun control legislation in the wake of Friday's shooting in Aurora, Colo. But that theory, the study's authors insisted, was always based on a false reading of the public opinion data."
Erin
2:46 pm on Saturday, December 15, 2012
Continued -
Ooops, left out a most important part of above study:
"82 percent of 945 self-identified gun owners said they support requiring criminal background checks for gun purchasers. The sample was divided evenly between gun owners who were current or lapsed members of the NRA and non-NRA gun owners. 74 percent of the NRA members said they support the background checks."
That in mind, why is it that the NRA pushed hard this week to pass another Michigan gun bill that would have REPEALED a state law mandating all handgun buyers pass a background check program run by the Michigan State Police, designed to block felons, domestic abusers and the severely mentally ill from obtaining a handgun license."
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/12/13/michigan-gun-bill-nra-background-checks_n_2295413.html?utm_hp_ref=mostpopular
"The alternate bill that DID pass the Michigan Senate eases the existing regulations on handgun licensing in several ways, most notably by repealing a mandatory handgun safety test required to obtain a permit."
John Fedricks
2:05 pm on Saturday, December 15, 2012
If Lansing has no promblem with guns in churches, schools and bars. Why not at government buildings, airports and work? I wonder if Synder would feel comfortable having a debate in a room with everyone packing a weapon? .
Col. Duke Lacrosse
3:23 pm on Saturday, December 15, 2012
John Fedricks you couldn't be more wrong. I go to gun ranges and events where everyone is carrying a pistol, and everyone is on their best behavior. An armed society is a polite society.
And FWIW, Snyder works with all kinds of people who are armed. They are known as the police. Your average LEO is, on average, no better and no worse than your average law-abiding citizen. Folks who obtain the CPL are definitely above-average citizens.
Howard Berkowitz
5:44 pm on Saturday, December 15, 2012
Thank for that information Erin.
Lacrosse from this thread your contention about an armed society is polite society is surely not coming through. Most of the gun advocates have name called and the others have been very polite.
Scot Beaton
5:47 pm on Saturday, December 15, 2012
Rochester Patch... Guns Aren't Going Anywhere
http://rochester.patch.com/blog_posts/guns-arent-going-anywhere
I welcome all comments... Rochester Patch, my heart and prayers go out to all those who lives will forever change because of gun violence... It's never to late to have a civil discussion on how to protect our children in school.
Colleen Barkham
7:19 pm on Saturday, December 15, 2012
I can't think of any reason to have concealed weapons in a school! We are thinking in the wrong direction. If we don't stop this crazy idea that our local communities aren't safe places, we will all be carrying guns and our children will be raised in one of the most frightening countries in the "civilized" world. No previous generation has had this problem and the only thing that has changed is the availability of assault weapons! I hold the NRA and our elected representatives responsible for the Newtown tragedy. Don't sign this gun legislation Gov. Snyder!
Marcus Burger
7:56 pm on Saturday, December 15, 2012
Coleen, read my post above taken from Wiki, RARELY are rifles used in committing a crime, to the point of almost being immeasurable! Think about it for a while, public morality, social media, violent movies and video games, both parents away from home working in a lot of instances. Go check out the vile language on Twitter some day, people are NASTY to each other these days, and I'm afraid it won't be better anytime soon. Did you ever see the movie "No Country for Old Men?" I'm 52, and I can't believe what is going on right now with peoples' attitudes, and our presidents' class warfare and divisiveness only add to the problem. We're going to need an intelligent, strong leader one day to even think about getting us out of this mess. There's a lot we'll never know about the incident in Ct, do a google search for the Mother of the gunman regarding the former CIA operative and comments regarding her clandestine work on psy/ops, that would explain the gun arsenal that she owned, standard CIA issue equipment. The problem is that her kid got his hands on it and we'll never hear the REAL story. Now they say the kids were all killed with a rifle, and there was a rifle still in the car, second shooter?
Col. Duke Lacrosse
8:18 pm on Saturday, December 15, 2012
"I can't think of any reason to have concealed weapons in a school!"
Then Colleen you are not a very thoughtful person. If a school employee had been legally allowed to carry a weapon, and that employee was there and armed and was motivated, that employee could have taken action and maybe one or two or who knows how many families would not be planning funerals right now. Your reasoning is exactly the kind of thinking that makes schools into criminal empowerment zones.
See here for an encouraging story about a recent crazed gunman:
http://thegunwire.com/blog/youtube-video-clackamas-mall-shooter-was-confonted-by-concealed-carrier-oregon/
Scot Beaton
8:22 pm on Saturday, December 15, 2012
Col. Duke Lacrosse... please post a comment at...
Rochester Patch... Guns Aren't Going Anywhere
http://rochester.patch.com/blog_posts/guns-arent-going-anywhere
I welcome all comments... Rochester Patch, my heart and prayers go out to all those who lives will forever change because of gun violence... It's never to late to have a civil discussion on how to protect our children in school.
Howard Berkowitz
9:39 pm on Sunday, December 16, 2012
Colleen,
I dont think we have to worry now about Snyder signing that harmful rightwing bill. He would only do it if the spotlight was not on this issue. One good thing that will come out of this horrendous tragedy.
Today at the gunshows there were long lines from the "polite" gun nut crowd buying these high capacity clips, knowing that soon they wont be able to buy them. These people are so "polite" they couldnt wait till the bodies of these children are in the ground before they rushed the gun shows to buy the very items that put these children on the way to their graves.
Thank god we have a President that is going to take action on this issue and try to protect all our children.
Cheryl Junker
8:58 pm on Saturday, December 15, 2012
We are definitely thinking in the wrong direction! I am in absolute agreement with Colleen but do not discredit Marcus' or Col's assertions that our culture has everything to do with the current gun violence in this country, starting with our media which is ther REAL source of the divisiveness and anger around us! Most of all it is FEAR that perpetuates the violence.
I am not going to let fear direct me into thinking that everyone needs to be armed in order to prevent gun deaths. I encourage posters to read the book COLUMBINE and even step out of their element to watch the movie 'Bowling for Columbine'. If anything this movie may prepare you for meeting up with Uncle Joe or Cousin Rich next week. ( You know, the guys you hate to admit you are related to but have to be civil to at least once a year )
Cheryl Junker
8:59 pm on Saturday, December 15, 2012
I will never feel comfortable with arming teachers and school administrators nor will I feel comfortable with Snyder's legislation as I recognize that this legislation has nothing to do with the Newtown incident and everything to do with an ALEC agenda ( the same agenda that led up to the Trayvon Martin killing).
For too long we have allowed the media to dictate our fears, desires and culture. It is time to put a stop to coroporate run fear machines.
I say this all with trepidation as I recognize that this is a very unpopular viewpoint to take. I am filled with sadness and my heart goes out to the victims and communty of Newtown. They will never recover fully from this. I know, because I lived in Aurora, Colorado in April 1999 and it took me 10 years to read ANYTHING about that day! I am still filled with grief!
That said, Snyder's legislation is NOT the solution.
Frank D.
8:35 am on Sunday, December 16, 2012
This thread is nothing but an emotional side show... The real discussion should focus on the real "root cause" of these kind of tragedies...to give you a tip...this "autistic" kid had issues, apparently his mother ended up home schooling him...Nancy Lanza ( his mother) pulled him from the school as she was unhappy with the school district plans for her son... She continued to have battles with the school system...Why is this not getting further explored...What is the root cause of our society without values and morality... Just look around, a lot of today's kids are a product of this environment..
Just review all these past school shooting event for the causal factors..!
Has nothing to do with gun control..Alas the OP of this article feels differently...
My prayers and love for all the affected parents and families...may the spiritual presence of these Angels guide them...
Howard Berkowitz
9:16 am on Sunday, December 16, 2012
All my children and all my freinds and relatives have values and morals. I dont know what kinda crowd you run with.
There is no reason for high capacity mags. The same day of this tragedy an attack in China on 20 school children caused no death, why no guns. So give me a break with this has nothing to do with gun control. You can make the point we just have to put up with these tragedies, cause it is so important to our society that everyone no matter who they are, needs to have access to guns and high capacity mags. To say it has nothing to do with gun control or the lack of it is rediculous.
If anything the children of today have better values and morals. You can just look at their attitudes towards racism, gay people and woman's rights to see they are more tolerant of others than people of older generations.
Better look out the window to see if you can yell at anyone for walking on your lawn.
Hughes
10:12 am on Sunday, December 16, 2012
Howie, making it legal to kill children makes it less likely to kill children? Your nuts! Treat unborn children like garbage and its easier to treat all children like that!
Thomas Gagne
10:19 am on Sunday, December 16, 2012
Frank, you can look for all the root causes you want, but they won't be solved. There's mental problems, poverty problems, moral problems, divorces, domestic abuse, selfishness, drug use, hypersensitivity, idle time, entitlement, religious extremism, prejudice, ignorance, and too many longer on emotion than reason.
Until we live in a perfect world, or leave this one for one that is perfect, each individual must decide if they'r willing to give their life, and the lives of their family or others they care for, to an anomaly breaking into an elementary, a theater, or a temple.
Personally, I don't think my family should be sacrificed at the alter of naivete, denial, delusion, and wishful thinking.
Our hypocracy is unlimited. If even one adult in the school were able to eliminate or slow Mr. Lanzo, they'd be celebrated today as a hero, fewer families may have been broken. Fewer children may have been lost.
That is what I would hope if evil ever visited my sons' schools.
Char Kruse
8:48 am on Sunday, December 16, 2012
well put Frank!
Al Trudeau
10:22 am on Sunday, December 16, 2012
Governor Snyder, no question about it - - VETO THAT BILL!!!
It is time - - no, LONG PAST TIME - - to put the emphasis where it REALLY belongs -- on the FIRST CLAUSE of the Second Amendment --- that guns really belong in "A WELL REGULATED MILITIA" and NOT in the hands of every damfool idiot who just wants to get his hands on them!!
Al Trudeau, Oakland Township
Thomas Gagne
10:27 am on Sunday, December 16, 2012
Mr. Trudeau, like many others, misunderstand the constitution and the 2nd amendment. The right to possess a firearm isn't given by the government in the 2nd amendment. The right to defend yourself is a natural right presupposed by the constitution, partially reiterated in the 2nd, underscored by the 9th, and was (according to The Atlantic) behind the composition of the 14th.
Al Trudeau
11:23 am on Sunday, December 16, 2012
I couldn't care less who presupposed, partially reiterated or underscored what!
All I know is that something needs to be done to minimize this senseless slaughter that recurs regularly in our society and effective gun control is one positive step in that direction
Al Trudeau, Oakland Twp
Frank D.
12:09 pm on Sunday, December 16, 2012
Effective gun control like in Norway...and I am sure you know what happen there as well.
How about addressing the mind set of these perpetrators...how about addressing our societal challenges..Special education for special needs, family values, TV and alike violences where guns seems to resolve everything..(Friday 10 people got shot in Chicago, etc..)
Suggest you also read this
http://gawker.com/5968818/i-am-adam-lanzas-mother
FCF
1:02 pm on Sunday, December 16, 2012
I agree with you Frank D. There are two concurrent streams of error occurring before our eyes. The first is the result of generations with no parents to speak of and the second is the mentally ill! Chicago is the result of the first - they are up to 488 murders, mostly young, this year - with 40 killed in one three day period earlier this year. The second is truly shown in your article reference. Political Correctness by those who lead with their hearts instead of their brains is slowly destroying our civil society! When the right thing to do is constantly obstructed by those who think they know what is best for you in spite of the shear logic of your position, our world is turning upside down. In light of those who perpetrate both the Chicago and Newtown types of violence we need to first protect ourselves and our loved ones. That means using the police where possible and using whatever defense is available when the police are out of reach.
Erin
4:04 pm on Tuesday, December 18, 2012
Tues 12/18 - Breaking News: Snyder Vetoes Gun Bill
Lianne Mathie
5:24 pm on Tuesday, December 18, 2012
Just one of them Erin.
Erin
6:05 pm on Tuesday, December 18, 2012
Lianne - you're right - 2 "streamlining the permit process" bills were signed today. I'll have to read those. I'm on a Snyder phone "town hall right" now.
Erin
6:53 pm on Tuesday, December 18, 2012
Lianne - okay, saw one that passed and signed - and I think it's a good one - a bill that requires the Michigan State Police, rather than local law enforcement, to maintain gun-permitting records. Police said it was crucial to have at least one agency hold on to records, citing the I-96 corridor shooter case last month, which was solved in part by going back through gun records.
I think the second one is HB 5225 which "•Repeals the requirement to register a completely legally purchased and owned firearm by a law-abiding citizen to be registered with the government through the police."
Does anyone know if this is one of the gun laws signed by Snyder this week. If not, what is it? All the press is mostly on concealed carry.
FCF
7:20 pm on Tuesday, December 18, 2012
Whew!!! Oh! In case you're wondering that is the expression all the future bad guys and crazies are expressing as they agree with the Gov's veto!!! What's worse is the revise if the legislature grants his request by adjusting for his objection will be worse! As it will have an "opt out" provision which will be just like the sign in the Aurora, CO. theater! Bad guys with guns have no fear - no guns here!
Good article if anyone wants to deal with facts:
http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/335739/facts-about-mass-shootings-john-fund
joel heller
4:22 am on Thursday, December 20, 2012
Good link FCF. Governor Snyder has been dealing with various threats to him and his family over the recent "right to work legislation". The risk of adding his name to the list of those being threatened with physical harm including death by a militant faction of the anti gun crowd may have been a bit too much for him.
One must wonder if the hatred espoused by this sub group could pose real danger. Does their hatred of guns and of those who believe there is nothing wrong with the 2nd Amendment as it is written preclude these anti gunners from having guns themselves? At least one leader of the broader anti-gun movement, Diane Feinstein, owns guns, has a very hard to get California Concealed Pistol Permit, and a healthy contingent of well armed guards. She believes others would be safer without their guns.
The link from FCF we are reminded that the chance of being involved in a mass shooting in the US is about the same as that of being struck by lightning. If we wish, and I know we all do, too make these events even less likely, there are measures that WILL do it. There are measures that will not.
I must again refer to the link above. “With just one single exception, the attack on congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords in Tucson in 2011, every public shooting since at least 1950 in the U.S. in which more than three people have been killed has taken place where citizens are not allowed to carry guns.
joel heller
4:22 am on Thursday, December 20, 2012
Any person or group who invokes Sandy Hook to push any agenda that can not be shown, through the use of proven facts and clear logic, to reduce the chances of it ever happening again, may be well meaning, but is non the less, part of the problem.
Steve Clarke
12:29 pm on Thursday, December 20, 2012
I agree with you 100%. I wish more people would sit back, think get the REAL facts before shooting their mouths off about something they know nothing about.
joel heller
2:21 am on Friday, December 21, 2012
Having read all the comments, the majority of responses pertain to the horrible emotional impact of the Sandy Hook Massacre. Some of the respondents have engaged in the "I'm hurting worse than you " battle. As if the idea that the more you hurt, the more valuable your solution becomes.
The President has promised legislation in January. As if more laws are the answer to any problem. Any proposed legislation must begin with a clear statement of purpose of what exactly is expected to improve when the thousands of pages that make up a bill are voted on. A sunset date is then included. If the stated purpose is not met by that date, the entire bill expires. Another expensive failure.
The Clinton "assault" weapon and high capacity (10 round limit) magazine ban was in effect for ten years. During that period, from 1994 through 2004 there were no significant changes in any gun crime statistical trends. There should be a statement of purpose on all proposed bills. How else can we measure effectiveness?
Gun crime has slowly but steadily been going down year by year since it peaked in the mid 80's. This year, for the first time ever, homicide (all causes) failed to make the top 15 causes of death list for the US. http://www.worldlifeexpectancy.com/usa/top-15-causes-of-death.
About 3% of the 12,000 or so annual homicides are by all rifles, of which assault (style) rifles are a small subset. About 2% of felons got their guns at a gun show.
FCF
2:32 am on Friday, December 21, 2012
All good points Joel! The interactive chart you highlight shows Washington D.C. as having the highest homicide rate. Interesting, considering how difficult it is for a citizen to have a gun for protection there. Regarding schools as gun free zones here is an article that summerizes well I think the points many, including myself, believe!
http://market-ticker.org/akcs-www?post=215107
Howard Berkowitz
8:46 am on Friday, December 21, 2012
This time the ban is going to have real teeth, like the one in Australia that sent these crimes plummeting.
About 40% of guns bought are bought without backround checks in Gun show like loopholes.
I worked Gun shows for 5 years, I bought guns in the isles manytimes with no paperwork. There is no reason for this. I dont know how you can measure that only 2% of felons got there guns at the gun show, when there is no papertrail lol. That sentence has no measurable meaning anyhow. You mean of all felons only 2% got guns at the gunshow, even the ones not seeking guns lol. What kinda stat is that? lol We are going to go ahead with a real sensible gun saftey bill and all the twisted stats are not going to change it. This one is different.
Thomas Gagne
9:26 am on Friday, December 21, 2012
I'm curious in the 2% stat as well. Here's a report from UC Davis that includes the stat and attempts to explain it. I haven't read the report yet so can't summarize it.
http://www.ucdmc.ucdavis.edu/vprp/pdf/IGS/IGSexecsummweb.pdf
joel heller
3:00 am on Friday, December 21, 2012
Precisely FCF. When you overlay the maps of homicides with those showing the degree of gun control on the law abiding, the maps are pretty much the same! Of course the "even good people can't be trusted with guns" crowd will say the restrictions were because the high crime ALREADY existed in these places. In fact, this IS usually the case. The point is clear. As the well meaning but uninformed sought to fight violent crime with ever more (anti) gun laws, the homicide rates INCREASED proportionality. The "cure" considerably worsened the disease.
joel heller
3:35 am on Friday, December 21, 2012
By the way, FCF, that piece from market-ticker is truly superlative. Of all the stuff I've read following Sandy Hook, this is the one best captures the "big picture". If big media had any interest in "balanced coverage", they would run this piece. Anyone interested in finding real answers to the problems surrounding the tragedy, should include this piece in their studies.
joel heller
3:15 am on Saturday, December 22, 2012
The link from Mr Gagne was to an article written by Garen Wintemute, MD, MPH
Violence Prevention Research Program. Many gun blame groups use the term "violence prevention" in their headers. As if all violence is bad. When evil people, groups or nations use violence to attain their goals, a superior level of violence is needed to turn them back. Let's make this perfectly clear. Guns and violence are tools.
The article does use the correct figure for gun shows as the source for guns in the possession for felons, Which is 2%. Howard's quote "40% of guns bought are bought without backround checks" comes from where? Backround checks aren't for everybody. Did you mean background?
Howard hates guns and gun shows, yet he "bought guns in the isles many times with no paperwork" In MI private (no background check) sales of guns have not been allowed at any of the gun shows I've been to for many years. I find it odd that a man with such a strong revulsion to guns, has bought so many.
Howard, if you were somehow there at Sandy Hook, with one of your many guns, would you have used violence to stop evil?
Howard Berkowitz
8:08 am on Saturday, December 22, 2012
I didnt say I had many guns I said I had bought many guns. I said I worked gun shows I didnt say only Michigan gunshows. When I first started doing it about 92 I believe they were still swapping guns in the isles of the gun shows in Michigan too. I worked gun shows also in Indiana, Ohio, Pa, Tennessee and Fla. I have one shot gun not loaded in my home.
If you had two son's and one received a BB Gun from his grandpa and a year later he shot the eye out of the other son, would your solution be to bring in another BB gun lol?
There have been armed persons at many of these mass shootings including Columbine. It is not the answer. The answer is common sense gun laws. No reason for high capacity clips and assaults weapons . You guys are not going to fight the government and if you had to in some fantasy, you would lose,,the government could fight you from an air conditioned office sending drones to destroy your homes.
Staliln is dead so is Hitler you are not going to fight them lol Wake up.
This time is different, we will get sensible gun laws that will decrease these fatalities just they did in Australia.
FCF
6:57 am on Saturday, December 22, 2012
Joel, good investigation! With the "Lions and Tigers and Bears Oh, My!" crowd complaining about the NRA advice and commitment to help with the implementation of armed security in our schools we should remember that Bubba did it back in 2000!
http://articles.latimes.com/2000/apr/16/news/mn-20323
Further, the NRA advised these security personnel could come from retired police or vets and be either paid or volunteer and who would receive training and certification - although you will not hear that particular description from the anti-gun crowd - who dismiss it as "Police, why that would be too expensive and take them off the streets!"
And Remember Columbine! Here is another good article!
http://pjmedia.com/tatler/2012/12/21/this-post-is-going-to-be-very-confusing-to-some-people/
joel heller
2:59 am on Sunday, December 23, 2012
"WASHINGTON — Marking the first anniversary of the shooting deaths at Columbine High School, President Clinton announced $120 million in new federal grants Saturday to place more police officers in schools". FCF's fist link covers the details. Bill and Hilary proposed this in April of 2002. This was eight years into the Clinton "assault rifle/ high capacity magazine ban" and three years after Columbine. When the Columbine massacre happened in 1999 they realized the need.. In 2003, the now obviously ineffective Clinton ban was allowed to expire.
The 2nd FCF link points out "The NRA proposed a similar " officers in schools " plan on Friday , in response to Sandy Hook. The article goes on to say "Barack Obama cut the funding for the Clinton era version of the same " cops in schools" program, presumably in his first term. Is this way there was not even one policeman on duty at Sandy Hook.? .
joel heller
2:59 am on Sunday, December 23, 2012
Perhaps Howard will provide an accuracy check on the above. If funds for school security were not cut, might Sandy Hook have been avoided? Is the answer to lowering the risk of another Columbine or Sandy Hook more school security? One thing is certain, Columbine occurred when the Clinton "assault rifle/ high capacity magazine ban" had been in effect for years.
What can be said of those who propose reviving some version of a failed plan to make our schools safer? Do they believe in the absence of all fact and logic that they are right? Do they hate guns so completely as to be blind to the facts and logic? Worse yet, some may believe these periodic tragedies are the price to be paid to rid society of as many guns as possible, from the law abiding, the criminal and the lunatic alike.
By the way, Howard, sorry to hear you are down to one gun. Would you use it to save your own life?