.

All Boards

Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
Posts awaiting your approval 0
Marty Rosalik April 16, 2014 at 04:44 PM
The stuffed Owl story is cruel irony, but I want to know exactly what these other tax payerRead Moreexpenses are that Mr. Schmidt speaks of. Out with it already! None of these new officials seem like the type to beat around the bushes. So tell us! Or are these baseless accusations meant to smear the others?
Carol Cook April 16, 2014 at 08:09 PM
ANSWER: BASELESS ACCUSATIONS. Just like in Washington, when THE JUST start getting close to theRead Moref acts and expose the truth, i.e. IRS, Obama Care, Benghazi, Fast and Furious, etc. the accusations of all sorts of malfeasance, discrimination and conspiracy come out by means to distract and discredit. The new board and Parks Commission members who are following Supervisor Gonser's twisted ideology are in the minority on both the Board and the Park Commission. The great take over didn't work and they are all lame ducks, and they know it. All they have left is to shoot out these baseless accusations to try to dis credit the other side in hopes of dissolving their will to stay the course. It all about intimidation. Formers Trustee's Keyes and McKay were targets of that intimidation and resigned. Thank you Trustee Bailey, Treasurer Langlois, Trustee Buxar and Clerk Reilly for taking a stand against it and sending a message to Supervisor Gonser that he is part of a BOARD and not a dictator. As to Commissioner Schmidt and Commissioner Rogers who are suing, along with Beth Markel, four incumbent Parks Commissioners who have served our community for more that 70 years collectively, you are costing ALL of us time, tax dollars and aggravation for more of your BASELESS ACCUSATiONS and we, the residents, will not forget that the next election cycle.
Jeremiah Swanson April 17, 2014 at 12:23 PM
Go have another drink Judy, I mean "Carol".
Beth April 17, 2014 at 09:47 PM
Mr. Kingsbury, you would be mistaken. Neither of us have posted to this thread, as the assumptionRead Moret hat either of us does anybody's "bidding" is ludicrous, laughable, and asinine. Now how is everybody doing with Patch's Acceptable Use parameters? "You are solely responsible for the Content that you post on the Service or transmit to other users. Without limitation, you agree that you will not post or transmit to other users anything that contains Content that: •is defamatory, abusive, obscene, profane or offensive; •infringes or violates another party's intellectual property rights (such as music, videos, photos or other materials for which you do not have written authority from the owner of such materials to post on the Service); •violates any party’s right of publicity or right of privacy; •is threatening, harassing or that promotes racism, bigotry, hatred or physical harm of any kind against any group or individual; •promotes or encourages violence; •is inaccurate, false or misleading in any way; •is illegal or promotes any illegal activities; •promotes illegal or unauthorized copying of another person's copyrighted work or links to them or providing information to circumvent security measures; •contains “masked” profanity (e.g., F@&#) •contains software viruses or any other computer code, files or programs designed to interrupt, destroy or limit the functionality of any computer software or hardware or telecommunications equipment; or •contains any advertising, promotional materials, "junk mail," "spam," "chain letters," "pyramid schemes," or any other form of solicitation. Instead of trying to memorize all that, you might boil it down to three main principles: “Keep it clean,” “Don’t try to trick people,” and “Treat others as you’d like to be treated.” Easy, right? "
Richard Michalski April 22, 2014 at 04:54 PM
Beth Markel: Since you were successful in having my earlier response removed by the Patch 'police' Read Morebecause I used some inappropriate names that YOU had previously called me on YOUR posts on the Patch, I will refrain from using those words. As I previously stated, I found your comments to Mr. Kingsbury hypocritical coming from you due to the names you have called me in the past. I would ask the citizens of Oakland Township to watch the first 20 minutes of the March 18th Board of Oakland Township to watch how your husband 'attacks' the Board members for following directions given them at the previous Board meeting, and your negative comment about the Foglers at the April 8th Board meeting.
Whereisthechange? April 22, 2014 at 11:05 PM
Yeah, Beth Markel had Cal Kingsbury's comments taken down too. His was the best!! I guess IRead Morewouldn 't want that truth about the Markels coming out if I were them either. But we already saw it, didn't we! We read yours too Mr. Michalski before she threatened Patch, and yes, you are right, Beth Markel's statements are most hypocritical as she did call you a very unpleasant name on this very sight and have made disparaging remarks about many other private citizens as well. We do have memories you know.