.

Can Rochester's New Superintendent Make a Difference?

Like the "old" General Motors, schools live in the past. A new chairman at GM made a difference, helping to restore it's icon status. Can the new Rochester superintendent make a difference?

Editor's note: Robert Shaner begins his role as superintendent of Rochester Community Schools on March 1.

In his recently released book, American Turnaround, Ed Whitacre describes how, as the newly appointed chairman of General Motors, he helped change the focus and direction of the company by battling the status quo.

Throughout the book, I kept seeing parallels between GM and our local schools, and was left wondering if our new superintendent could do the same in Rochester.

Whitacre didn’t really set out to be a change agent, but once he arrived, he could see that the senior management at GM had simply grown too accustomed to their own bizarre way of doing things. Matrix management “allowed them escape accountability, and endless PowerPoint presentations misdirected attention and consumed precious time."

In a very similar way, our schools are structured so that nobody is really accountable for the end result; they are only responsible for “delivering instruction.” Schools grind kids through the mill the same way, year after year. And as far as PowerPoints … ever sit though a school board meeting?

Whitacre was able to see these things because he was an outsider.  And as he repeatedly pointed out, this malaise had been going on for years, and was the direct result of the senior management, who, even after watching their stock price and market share plummet over a six year period, refused to accept that they had done anything wrong.  For the most part they felt that “the economy got us”, and just could not accept the reality of the world in which they found themselves, and acknowledge that THEY were largely responsible for their own situation.

Our schools live in that same fantasy.  They blame the state and incessantly complain about “inadequate” or “unstable” funding.  They ridicule state assessments and benchmarks, denounce “cut scores” and grumble about graduation requirements.  Any suggestion that they do things differently is framed as “an attack on teachers.”  They refuse to accept that the world – and its financial resources, career requirements, and learning technologies – are evolving.

Whitacre saw plenty of talent at GM, stymied by the bureaucracy.  We’ve got plenty of talented teachers in Rochester who are not fully achieving their potential because of an antiquated structure.

And GM was not particularly customer oriented, either with their dealers (who buy from GM), or the retail customer (that ultimately buys the car).  Likewise, our schools have set up THEIR way of doing things, and both parents and students are expected to squeeze themselves into the school mold.

In the case of GM, the senior managers ignored the changes that were happening around them, and were subsequently driven – forcibly – into extinction.  There was some unfortunate collateral damage along the way, but GM survived, and now appears to be thriving.

Public schools have for too long ignored the market forces swirling around them.  They continue to follow a largely one-size-fits-all approach to education, with the primary emphasis being “butts in seats”.  The teaching model they use is not much different than the one used 50 years ago, with a single teacher in front of X number of kids, who live in the same neighborhood, grouped by age.  It too deserves to be driven – forcibly – into extinction.

Parents and students are realizing that education today can be so much more!

Imagine a school where together parents, teachers, and students could collaborate on an individual education plan that can appropriately mix classroom instruction, homework, and self-paced on-line learning.  Students could progress based on their ability to learn, and not be limited to the speed of the classroom.  Those that struggle would have access to more one-on-one time with our learning professionals.  Education will be driven and measured by results, not by a time clock and “seat time”.

Just like GM, our public education system is destined to smack head-on into market forces.  The world is moving fast, and parents realize our children need to be better prepared.    Just like the old GM, the education bureaucracy is bristling, hoping that ignoring the market forces will just make them go away.

For GM, it took a bankruptcy, a bailout, and a new chairman to drive change.

What will it take for our public education system?

Governor Snyder recognizes the opportunity and potential, and has started planting the seeds.  He commissioned the Oxford Foundation to generate ideas that will make Michigan a national leader in education. This threatens the monopoly the current bureaucracy holds over our children, and with the right leadership has the potential of driving significant and positive change – just like we saw with GM.

The question is … will our new superintendent lead us into a new future like Whitacre, or will he attempt to drive a stake in the ground, and keep defending the status quo?

This post is contributed by a community member. The views expressed in this blog are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Patch Media Corporation. Everyone is welcome to submit a post to Patch. If you'd like to post a blog, go here to get started.

James Redd February 28, 2013 at 06:42 PM
fracking is our future. Just wait and see. Just wait.......
Cheryl Junker February 28, 2013 at 06:51 PM
Let me extrapolate a bit. I think we can both agree that you are a computer guy. We have discussed the gamut of alternate educational environments including self guided on line educational curriculums such as seen in 'Carpe Diem' charter school. Lets just say that I have a difficult time wrapping my head around that type of learning despite being on board with a more individualized curriculum. Perhaps my knee jerk reaction was a direct result of watching my middle school daughter having to learn about the entire Russian Revolution on line from Wilkepedia last night in an attempt to write a comparison/contrast argument for 'Animal Farm'. Now, I know I did not read Animal Farm until I was in high school and to be honest continue to struggle with comparing Totalitarianism,Socialism and Communism. So to have to have my daughter grapple with such broad controversial topics without the aid of a teacher to lead the discussion is somewhat disheartening. ( Kind of like discussing broad off topic subjects on line I suppose ) And the 'elimination of core curriculum' was a response to Charles Murry's book which emphasized 'individualized education'. Yes, the 'Capitalist 'comment was thrown in 'for fun' I suppose. I could have thrown in 'Socialist' as well but refrained. I have a feeling your blood pressure might not handle that. I do think it would behoove both of us to come up with a common definition for the words 'Conservative' and 'Socialist'. Blog post anyone?
Cheryl Junker February 28, 2013 at 06:52 PM
Oh believe me, I have no doubt you will make that happen! Where are you moving to?...France?
Amy February 28, 2013 at 09:07 PM
More from this Republican and his push for a Republican agenda... don't you know folks can see right through your article into your love for Governor Snyder? Sheesh.
Mike Reno February 28, 2013 at 10:01 PM
Yes, when you look at the article with a particular mindset, you are going to see what you want to see.

Boards

More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »